Built for Legacy Files

Best when an older BEP or BER needs to be reviewed against current lifecycle and evidence expectations.

Practical Review Prompts

Includes checks for device representation, endpoints, waived tests, chemistry integration, and reviewer-facing clarity.

Useful Before Remediation

Helps internal teams decide whether the next step is light revision, targeted remediation, or a full rewrite.

What It Covers

A fast self-check before you spend time defending weak documentation

The checklist is built for teams reviewing older files, preparing for submission, or trying to understand whether a document is likely to survive reviewer scrutiny. It is not a substitute for project-specific advice, but it gives you a structured way to catch obvious gaps before they become expensive.

Best when you already have a draft

Use it on a BEP, BER, TRA, or summary section that already exists and needs a sharper review lens.

Best when timing matters

Useful before FDA submission, notified body response work, or internal sign-off on a near-finished package.

Best when the team needs triage

Helps distinguish between surface-level cleanup and deeper gaps in logic, evidence, or document framing.

Best when 2025 changes are unclear

Highlights where lifecycle framing, benefit-risk language, and chemistry linkage often need strengthening.

Request the Checklist

Fill in a few details and the checklist download will open on the thank-you page.

Best For

  • Legacy BEP or BER updates
  • Pre-submission quality checks
  • FDA or notified body remediation planning

What Happens Next

  • Download the editable checklist immediately after submit
  • Use it internally on your current documentation package
  • Move to the paid gap review if the file needs expert triage

This is an asset request, not a mailing-list trap. If you later need a faster document triage, the next step is the focused submission gap review.