ISO 10993 and Toxicology
Senior support on endpoint justification, toxicological framing, chemistry-linked biological evaluation, or specialized scientific review.
Associate Experts
Collaborate With MedDev Advisory
This page is for experienced specialists interested in selected project-based collaboration. Client engagements remain founder-led, with associate experts brought in only where the scope genuinely benefits from domain-specific depth.
How It Works
Founder-led delivery. Specialist collaboration where it truly adds value.
MedDev Advisory is not a staffing platform and this is not a generic open job board. Projects are scoped, qualified, and led by Arvind Rathore. For selected scopes, vetted specialists may contribute domain-specific expertise under a defined collaboration model.
The standard is direct, hands-on experience. I only consider specialists who can demonstrate real regulatory or scientific depth in the specific area they want to support.
Project-based collaboration only
No guaranteed minimum workload
Confidentiality and conflict discipline required
Selected Domains
Current Collaboration Areas
These are the areas where specialist support may be relevant. Inclusion here does not mean constant hiring or automatic project flow.
EU MDR Technical Documentation
Specialists with real Technical File, GSPR, CER-adjacent, PMCF/PMS, or notified body remediation depth where the scope goes beyond core biocompatibility writing.
FDA Regulatory Support
Hands-on experience with 510(k), De Novo, PMA, reviewer questions, or submission architecture in areas complementary to biocompatibility documentation.
QMS and Risk Management
Experienced contributors for ISO 13485, ISO 14971, change-control, CAPA, or risk-file integration where project scope requires stronger system alignment.
Clinical and Literature Work
Selective support for systematic literature review, CER-adjacent analysis, PMCF-related writing, or evidence synthesis connected to device safety and performance.
India / CDSCO Selected Projects
Only for professionals with direct, practical CDSCO experience in classification, pathway planning, documentation readiness, or submission execution. This is not a placeholder category.
Vetting Standard
What I Look For Before Any Collaboration
Real Delivery Experience
I am looking for people who have actually prepared, reviewed, or defended the kind of work they claim. General interest without real project history is not enough.
Documentation Quality
Good collaboration depends on precision, structure, and strong written reasoning. In this field, wording quality affects regulatory risk directly.
Confidentiality Discipline
Client-sensitive work requires discretion, clear conflict boundaries, and comfort operating under NDA or restricted-scope review conditions.
Reliable Communication
Project-based work only functions when expectations, scope, and deadlines are handled cleanly. Slow or ambiguous communication is a non-starter.
Process
How Collaboration Usually Starts
01
Initial Review
I review your background, domain fit, and whether the expertise matches the kind of work likely to arise.
02
Short Conversation
If the fit looks credible, we discuss scope boundaries, working style, confidentiality expectations, and likely collaboration conditions.
03
Project Fit Check
For real opportunities, I define what part of the work needs specialist support and whether the collaboration is the right match.
04
Scoped Engagement
Any collaboration is set project-by-project with defined responsibilities, timing, and communication expectations.
What to Send
- LinkedIn profile and short introduction
- Primary regulatory or scientific domains
- Markets and frameworks worked in
- Types of devices or documentation handled
- Availability model: project-based, ad hoc, or limited monthly capacity
Important Conditions
- This is project-based collaboration, not guaranteed employment.
- No category is listed here unless real hands-on expertise is expected.
- Founder-led client ownership remains central to the delivery model.
- Specialist involvement is decided case-by-case based on fit and scope.
Apply
Submit Your Collaboration Profile
Use this form if you want to be considered for selected project-based collaboration. The more concrete your regulatory scope, device classes, and documentation experience, the easier it is to assess fit properly.
Best submissions include
- Direct delivery examples, not generic capability claims
- Clear markets and standards handled
- Specific device or documentation categories
Profile ready
Your next step will appear here.